Banking Ombudsmen have been directed as under: (Below is a transcript. For original email, see picture below...)
Kindly take note of the following points while dealing with the cases:
1. Please ensure that you are within the four walls of the BO Scheme. Do not take up items beyond the 27 items mentioned in Clause 8. The Clause 8-u deals with violations to RBI Guidelines / directions regarding the banking services only but is not an omnibus clause to entertain any complaint.
2. Please avoid all time barred cases.
3. BO has no jurisdiction if a case on the same issue is pending in any court of law / consumer forum, etc. Do not entertain SARFAESI affected cases.
4. BO Scheme jurisdiction is confined to transactions within the country except internet transactions. ATM / POS transactions outside the country are not covered.
5. LC / BG cases have been removed from the scope of the BO Scheme and hence do not entertain complaints thereof.
6. Please be careful regarding the pecuniary jurisdiction of the BO for awarding compensation. In any case where a complainant demands compensation of above Rs. 10 Lakhs, or above Rs. 1 lakhs in credit card cases, please reject such complaints upfront. Here it may be noted that the disputed amount is different from compensation.
7. Do not reopen cases closed by you / your predecessor even if additional evidence surfaces or are produces post closure. Also in case of queries on closed cases which warrant a reply Please just reiterate the earlier decision giving the date in bold. We are receiving appeal cases based on the latest letter just to ensure that appeal is submitted within one month of closure of a case.
8. Do not indicate appeal provision for cases closed under non-appealable clauses (All cases other than 13-d, e, f.
Clause 11 closure
We notice that BOs are closing cases under 11 -1 (Full satisfaction) even when there is no conciliation meeting. All such cases result in appeal as agreement is vital to 11-1 closure. Whenever a conciliation meeting is held, and if the parties do not agree, then the closure has to be under 13-C as a unilateral decision by BO is not possible under oral evidence. If the BO is convinced on the basis of papers produced, then under 11-3 he can take a summary decision, and perhaps issue an award. All cases closed under 11-1 should have signatures of both the parties certifying agreement. We find that when a bank produces all the records (Switch / log / JP / Electronic Journal / Cash Balance Reports), and still the complainant insists on non-receipt of cash, then the BO cannot take evidence under oath and decide, the closure has to be under 13-C.
Please minimise closure under 13-d as the complainants are deeply upset when informed that their complaint is without cause. Instead, close it under 13-a if the BO is convinced that the bank has followed all the rules laid down in DBOD / Banks Internal Circulars. For example, if pricing is freed under DBOD guidelines, then if a bank's Board has approved a certain policy, and in the said transaction if the Board policy is adhered to, then there is no violation of DBOD guidelines, then the disposal is under clause 13-a provided disclosure norms have been followed.
BO should invariably cite the clause under which a case has been closed and ensure that the case is marked off in CTS quoting the same clause.
It may be noted that the jurisdiction of the Appellate Authority is exactly the same as that of the BO. Further, fresh evidence cannot be produced at the Appellate Stage. Hence it is very important to close a case citing the correct clause. Further, take care to mention the appeal provisions for cases closed under 13-d,e,f which are the appealable clauses.
With Best Regards,
Chief General Manager
I am very happy to be able to publish these guidelines to Banking Ombudsmen because after reading these, bank customers in India shall be more aware of their rights and will have more realisitic expectations from Banking Ombudsmen.
Here are the Email Pictures
|RBI Guidelines to Banking Ombudsmen - Page 1|
|RBI Guidelines to Banking Ombudsmen Part - 2|
How This Email was Issued (RBI response to my RTI application:
|RBI reply to RTI Application|